|
Home
Daily Stock Tips Information
Subscription Options
Resources & Links Login
Daily Stock Tips: Free Report #1
Daily Stock Tips Free Report: The Really Big Advantages of
Swing Trading versus Buy and Hold
Unless you have been
living under a rock these past 10 years or so, you know that times
are changing at a faster pace today than ever before in history.
Though personal computers have really only been in widespread use
for the past 15 years, it is hard to imagine a business, big or
small, that does not rely on computers for accounting, inventory,
sales and marketing and virtually every other aspect of business. A
little over ten years ago the Internet was but a vague dream
accessible only to the cognoscenti in the computer world.
There have been more technological advances in the last 100 years
(and even the last 50 years if you really think about it) than in
all the thousands of years of prior history. Many of you grew up in
homes with outdoor plumbing, only occasional hot water, unreliable
electricity, no air conditioning, no televisions, with radio being
the hottest thing going, and no one believing that "talkies" would
ever last. At the time you didn’t realize how just how deprived you
were! Our lifestyles have changed so dramatically that few of us
ever take the time to reflect on how far we’ve come in such a short
time.
Yet despite all these advances and the almost daily rush of
changes (many experts think that the single greatest change that the
technological revolution ushered in is the ability of the average
Joe and Mary to access information that was previously available
only to the rich and the powerful) there are many investment
advisors who tell their clients that the best strategy for investing
in stocks is to "buy and hold." They argue that you should buy stock
in good solid "can’t miss" companies, then simply hold that stock
until you retire, when you can cash in your accumulated riches. Keep
in mind this group was recommending such "can’t miss" stocks as
Polaroid, Studebaker, U.S. Sugar, Western Union, Central Leather,
Woolworth, Nash Motors, and many other former components of the Dow
Jones Industrial Average over the years.
But if you really want to understand how this mythology still manages
to dominate the investment scene, "follow the money." The strongest
advocates of buy and hold are the huge mutual funds. They want you to put
your hard earned dollars into their funds so they can earn average returns
for you while taking their healthy fees out along the way. After all, it
is the fund managers and promoters who have the yachts. Haven’t you ever
wondered where are their customers’ yachts?
Let’s take a look at just one representative example. We could pick one
of the high flying highly volatile technology stocks of recent years and
show you how much money could be made "swing" or intermediate term
trading. But picking the best case scenario does not really teach
anything.
We’ll take a look at one of the stodgy blue chip stocks in the Dow
Jones Industrial Average. Dupont (DD) is the well known huge international
chemical company and is considered one of the bluest of blue chip stocks,
a stable company and a stable stock suitable for buy and hold from even
the most skeptical.
You could have purchased Dupont (DD) on June 30, 2003 at $41.64 per
share. If you held it for a year, you would have sold it on June 29, 2004
at $44.15. That would have been a gain of $2.51 per share, or a return for
the 12 months of about 6%. Add to that the 3.2% dividend paid by DD over a
year, you would have made about 9.2%. Compounding (reinvesting your
profits and dividends) you could double your money about every 8 years at
that rate. Not too shabby, till you consider a conservative, easy to
understand and implement swing trading strategy.
The numbers below represent realistic potential swing profits, trading
just this one, hardly ideal candidate, using a few easily recognized
timing signals (reversals, outside days, and 3 day highs). Note that we
are illustrating this with closing prices only. The profits would have
been much greater if we used daily highs or lows, or even average daily
prices.
Using only timing signals, without reference to other key indictors
such as volume or moving averages, a reasonably attentive trader could
have done the following:
|
6/30/03 Buy @ $41.64
7/15/03 Sell @ $42.50 Profit = $0.86 or $86 for every 100 shares
7/22/03 Buy @ $42.85
7/29/03 Sell @ $43.97 Profit = $1.12 or $112 for every 100 shares
8/7/03 Buy @ $42.73
8/21/03 Sell @ $44.82 Profit = $2.14 or $214 for every 100 shares
8/26/03 Buy@$43.20
9/3/03 Sell @$44.82 Profit = $1.62 or $162 for every 100 shares
10/7/03 Buy@$40.19
10/9/03 Sell@$40.89 Profit = $0.70 or $70 for every 100 shares
11/6/03 Buy@$39.46
11/14/03 Sell@$40.19 Profit = $0.73 or $73 for every 100 shares
11/24/03 Buy@$39.96
12/15/03 Sell@$44.11 Profit = $4.05 or $405 for every 100 shares
12/16/03 Buy@$44.46
1/2/04 Sell@$45.51 Profit = $1.05 or $105 for every 100 shares
2/4/04 Buy@$43.76
2/19/04 Sell@$45.54 Profit = $1.78 or $178 for every 10 shares
3/25/04 Buy@$41.96
4/20/04 Sell@$44.63 Profit = $2.67 or $267 for every 100 shares
5/12/04 Buy@$41.62
5/14/04 Sell@$41.69 Profit = $0.07 or $7 for every 100 shares
5/18/04 Buy@$41.40
6/3/04 Sell@$42.52 Profit = $1.12 or $112 for every 100 shares
6/7/04 Buy@$43.61
6/24/04 Sell@$43.97 Profit = $0.36 or $36 for every 100 shares
TOTAL PROFIT = $18.27 or $1,827 for every 100 shares traded.
|
In other words, using a conservative easy to implement swing trading
strategy that used only closing prices for both buying and selling, you
would have made OVER 7 TIMES more money than using the buy and hold
strategy for the same stock.
But of course that is not the whole story. When you swing trade, your
costs will go up because you incur more commissions. In the old days when
commissions were fixed by the New York Stock Exchange, this simple swing
trading strategy would have only been marginally more profitable than the
buy and hold. But fixed commissions went the way of the horse and buggy
over 20 years ago.
One widely advertised quality brokerage firm (Scottrade) charges only
$7 per trade (with certain limitations). If you paid $7 for each of those
13 trades, your profit would have been reduced $91 (assuming you traded
100 shares each time). So instead of making $1,827 for trading 100 shares
on each signal, you would have made only $1,736, still nearly 7 TIMES more
money than what the buy and hold strategy earned.
The buy and hold returned about 6% (or 9.2% including dividends). The
swing trading strategy returned nearly 42% AFTER commissions. At 42% per
year if you re-invested your profits and dividends, you would double your
money every 1.7 years.
And remember, the returns would have been much higher if we would have
selected a volatile good quality high technology stock, or if we would
have sold short on short selling signals as well as taking the buy
signals, or if we employed entry techniques to get better buy and sell
prices than simply using the closing price each time. The swings are
greater for over-the-counter NASDAQ stocks than for a stodgy old component
of the Dow Jones Industrial Average like Dupont.
But that is the whole point of this exercise. If you can earn many
times more swing trading a blue chip slow moving stock than simply buying
and holding, imagine the potential returns that the same disciplined
strategy could earn in more volatile stocks.
Buy and hold is a strategy designed to line the pockets of big money
managers while earning "average" returns for their clients. If an
"average" return is all you want, maybe buy and hold if for you. But for
traders willing to invest a little time with a small effort the potential
to earn profits many times greater than "average" is a very real
possibility.
Click Here For Daily Stock
Picks Information |